Why Doesn’t EVERYTHING Use USB?

Why Doesn't EVERYTHING Use USB?

Hi, this is Wayne again with a topic “Why Doesn’t EVERYTHING Use USB?”.
Ethernet USB HDMI DisplayPort: why are there so many different kinds of cables and connectors? I mean think about it. All these cables carry digital signals which are just ones and zeros and with the newest version of usb4, carrying up to a whopping 80 gigabits per second. Why can’t we just have one cable for everything, whether it’s USB or something else? Well, there are actually some pretty good reasons, and as long as we’re talking about usb looking at the history of USB specifically, is a good place to start in answering this question. Think about how many things do use USB mice, keyboards game controllers printers, you name it, but in the past there was a very specific connector for every one of these devices, with USB being in part, an attempt to bring most computer peripherals under the same umbrella.

But USB had its own limitations, at least in the early years of the spec. Most of the gadgets that connected through USB didn’t need super high speed data transfer. I mean it doesn’t exactly take much for a keystroke to travel down a wire. However, USB simply wouldn’t cut it for the very important use case of digital video, like the one you’re watching right now. For example, a 1080p uncompressed video signal at 60 frames per second.

Basically, the default for mainstream PCS takes just under 3 000 megabits per second of bandwidth. This is way more than the USB 2.0 speed of 480 megabits per second or the USB 1.1 speed of 12 megabits per second, so instead, DVI, which was designed specifically for video in 1999, had a single link, speed of just under 4 000 megabits per second different League by the time, USB 3.0 came around offering 5000 megabit or 5 gigabit per second speeds. Dvi was fully ingrained in the market, and HDMI was starting to become popular for monitors as well, and even though USB is now capable of supporting very high quality video. In terms of bandwidth, this capability has to be implemented by the display itself, which costs more money than just putting in an existing HDMI or display port connector that we know just works, except that DisplayPort sucks, sometimes not to mention that consumers could very easily be confused.

If they try to connect a USB monitor to a computer that has a different implementation of USBC that doesn’t support video out at all. This is one of the drawbacks of having one port to rule them all. It’S just.

Why Doesn't EVERYTHING Use USB?

We don’t know what it does, but lest we go on and on at length about why there aren’t more USB monitors. Let’S talk about some other familiar familiar cables and connectors right after we think freshbooks for sponsoring today’s video, whether you own a business or do freelance work. Freshbooks is designed to make accounting and invoicing easier for you with the ability to integrate, with over 100 different apps.

Why Doesn't EVERYTHING Use USB?

There is always a simple way for you to connect with your team and clients. It’S easy to start and their award-winning support. Staff is always there to help so take some of the unnecessary stress out of your life and start your first 30 days, free with no credit card required by going to freshbooks.com. Techwiki ethernet is another standard that you might think should be superseded by USB.

Why Doesn't EVERYTHING Use USB?

The simplest reason it hasn’t been has to do with cable length this time, not bandwidth the maximum cable length for gigabit or 10 gigabit Ethernet is 100 meters, whereas the max recommended length for USB is between one and three meters, depending on which revision and what kind Of speed you want beyond these short distances, you’d have signal attenuation, meaning degraded speeds, which would be be a huge problem for networking, as those cables often need relatively long runs. Think about connections between servers, far away from each other in a data center or routing cables. Inside of the walls for ethernet Jackson, a house or an office building, ethernet cables are generally simpler to manufacture than USB, and their physical construction means that they can support these long distance runs at a lower cost. Usb is probably not going to take over anytime soon. For that, but one common type of connection that we haven’t mentioned yet is the analog connection which is commonly used for audio applications. Think about the three and a half millimeter stereo Jack, your headphones use or used to use or the RCA cables for your amplifier speakers and headphones rely on varying analog voltages in order to drive them and specifically create the sounds. You hear meaning there’s not a way to directly replace these connections with something digital like USB. Even USB gaming headsets still require internal digital to analog conversion in order to work.

So if you’re using speakers or headphones without internal logic, there’s going to be an analog cable somewhere in the mix bottom line, even though it seems like we could technically have one connector for everything, concerns about the cost, the communications protocol and even the construction of the Different cables and Jacks means that they’re still good at different things. That doesn’t mean that the number of connectors and cables we use won’t continue to gradually decrease over time, but I wouldn’t expect a truly Universal Electronics connector anytime soon. Besides think about how hard it would be to give Tech Support to your Normie, family and friends over the phone or something or video, if every connector looked the same, it’s hard enough as it is thanks for watching guys if you like this video hit like hit Subscribe and hit us up in the comment section with your suggestions for topics that we should cover in the future.

.