The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD

The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD

Hi, this is Wayne again with a topic “The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD”.
As much as amd and intel fanboys like to scream at each other online, the average user would be hard-pressed to notice the difference between these companies cpus in everyday use unless you’re like us and benchmark things religiously, but on the inside modern chips from team, red and Team blue are built quite differently, so let’s take a look at how starting with amd ryzen cpus are made up of at least one core complex or ccx, but don’t worry despite the name. It’S not a complex thing to understand. A ccx is just a group of cores, along with some cache memory. Newer, zen3 chips have cc axes with 8 cores, while zen 2 cpus have 4 cores per ccx. Each ccx lives on a chiplet called a ccd.

The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD

The setup on zen 3 is pretty straightforward. One ccx per ccd with up to 2 ccds per processor for a total of 16 cores on zen 2. Each ccd can instead hold two of these smaller ccx’s, resulting in the same 16 core maximum. But what links all these core complexes together? Well, you’ve probably heard of amd’s infinity fabric, which is their secret sauce bus that can run between ccx’s or between ccds. Although it’s a high high-speed interconnect that works pretty well with ryzen, beating out competing intel chips and a good number of benchmarks, it’s still not as fast as having the cores more directly connected as there’s higher latency with infinity fabric, and the connection is serial rather than Parallel, but there are real benefits to this approach. One is that the smaller chiplets mean big cost savings due to better yield.

The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD

If one chiplet is bad, you can discard just that one chiplet without wasting as much silicon from throwing away a whole cpu. This ccx plus infinity fabric approach also scales quite well, so you can just add more chiplets if you need more cores instead of spending more time and money, designing a whole new chip. Is that how intel does it we’ll tell you right after we thank brilliant for sponsoring this video brilliant? Is a website and app built around active learning? That’S accessible and fun trade boring long lectures for problem solving and interactive visuals there’s over 60 courses to choose from including their new everyday math course where you can get a refresher on foundational math topics. You might not have touched since high school join the community of 10 million learners and educators.

The ACTUAL Difference Between Intel and AMD

Today, the first 200 people who head to brilliant.org techwiki, will get a 20 off an annual premium subscription, so intel, in contrast to amd, still uses monolithic chip designs where cores are right next to each other, at least for the time being. This approach allows the cores to talk with each other more directly, but it has the opposite problems as amd’s chiplet design, lower yield, less scalability and higher cost, but team blue isn’t going to be left behind as the industry moves towards chiplets, except they call them tiles. Instead, because they just had to be different in 2023, we’re expecting a lineup of mainstream processors called meteor lake, based on tiles connected by something called emibs, which unfortunately, is a way less cool name than infinity fabric. In fact, we’ve already seen emibs in the kbla g processors from a few years ago, which used emibs to connect the built-in radeon gpu to its hbm memory, as well as in intel’s ponte vecchio. Supercomputer chips intel thinks it’s a more elegant solution to amds, even going so far as to drop a not so subtle, star wars, reference to it on its website and to be fair to them. They might be right instead of having a big old slab of silicon, that the chiplets all sit on.

An emib is a much smaller piece of silicon that connects tiles on either side. Not only do you need less silicon which keeps costs lower, but it’s also even easier to scale instead of being limited by the size of your expensive silicon under layer, you can just use multiple e-mibs to build outward. It’S a little bit like how the tiles that make up a modern basketball court snap into place and unlike infinity fabric e-mibs, move data in parallel, giving them higher bandwidth while at the same time offering lower latency with less power loss according to intel anyway. But there are still probably limits on just how many of these tiles you can put together as a setup.

That’S too large could start hitting a thermal ceiling. Intel also has another method to connect chiplets called foveros, which involves stacking chips on top of each other, but this hasn’t seen much adoption in the consumer space. Yet only a couple of laptops that were released in 2020 feature photorose chips and that specific lineup called lakefield was discontinued due to poor demand.

However, the idea of chip stacking is something that intel seems committed to for its future, but even though both intel and amd are trying to break up the classic monolithic chip design, don’t expect it to go away completely. These fancy methods of linking chipless together do cost money, so at the lower end of the market, simpler monolithic designs for systems that don’t need tons of computing muscle will be with us for quite some time. So if you find yourself in the market for something cheaper, but you really want a chiplet there’s, always those broken pringles at the bottom of the can, thanks for watching guys like dislike check out some of our other videos.

Maybe comment with video suggestions and don’t forget to subscribe and follow. .