Hi, this is Wayne again with a topic “Please Stop Doing This.”.
Amd’S numbers are bigger than Intel’s according to multiple sources, and leaks AMD has decided to rename their upcoming ryzen 8050 99050 apus in order to insert AI in the name resulting in the ryzen AI 100 series. Okay, this I believe we already talked about ridiculous obnoxious. I don’t think anybody looked at Intel’s core Ultra naming scheme and went wow. That makes it easier to understand what your product line is, and I just I can’t really wrap my brain around this because on the oneand you look at a sort of misleading or confusing naming scheme, and you go oh well. That makes sense so that they can sell you something not as good and make it sound good like something you would want, but when it’s just a random mumble jumble of numbers and letters, how the am I supposed to know that I would want any of it. I don’t really understand what they’re trying to achieve here so naturally AMD followed suit. With this supposed ryzen AI 100 series, no wait.
It gets better. More recent leaks indicate that AMD has again internally rebranded these chips, this time to ryzen AI 300 series so that they will not appear less numerically advanced than Intel’s core Ultra 200 series, which is following the core Ultra 100 series. Better chip can, I just say this AMD at some point.
You know you got the market share. You’Ve got the performance. You’Ve got the Mind, share man, you guys have got the engineering knowhow at some point.
You’Ve got to respect yourself at some point. You’Ve got to stop just calling your product into naming scheme plus right. It goes all the way back to the pr or the performance rating system from back in what that would have been late’90s early 2000s somewhere in that time frame, when AMD had already abandoned the gigahertz race, they had recognized that chasing more and more gigahertz was not The solution to gaining better performance and better efficiency, and so it started out kind of valid enough right where they were saying look.
Our processor doesn’t run at the same frequency, but we’re going to have this PR rating system. That’S going to be pretty much. What Intel would have run at that kind of frequency, but like better so they put Plus at the end and then AMD got kind of Loosey Goosey, with the performance rating plus towards the end of the Athlon XP days, in particular, where you could buy a 32200 Plus but uh well here, let me put it this way: they released a 3200 plus Athlon 64 product okay, so that was their next Generation K8 compared to the K7.
They released a 3200 plus that absolutely bulldozed the original Athlon XP 3200 plus it wasn’t even close. Okay, so AMD knew I’m I’m note. I don’t even have to bring an Intel chip into the comparison. Amd clearly knew that uh, if this is 3200 Plus this can’t be, and they’ve pulled this kind of time and time and time again, man, I’m trying to think of uh, I’m trying to think of one of the ones recently where they they changed.
The naming of their chipset so that um, so that when Intel released their new chipset, it would be it would be the same number or something like that guys guys. Let me know in the chat, let me know which one it was I’m trying to remember. Uh yeah hit me hit me with that x37 versus z370 yeah. That might have been one of them. The point is they’ve done this over and over and over again it is so obnoxious just be your own company, with your own product line, Comm, communicate your own value ad and stop trying to confuse consumers. We understand why you’re doing it, you want to make your generation of product seem like it’s a generation ahead of Intel, but this is such a stupid game and if you play it, you’re just going to win stupid prizes because now now, what’s oh man, I’m trying To wrap my head, so so what so? What so Intel’s going to skip a generation now and then they’re going to have 400 and then AMD is just going to have what odd numbers and Intel’s going to have even number like? No one’s going to be able to understand what they’re buying I hate it they’re going end up changing naming schemes entirely because, like Intel’s not going to be Happ with being leap, frogged, all the time so they’re going to like have to change some, which I’m completely For honestly, because I’ve never liked the core branding um the core man, the fact like ryzen, 5 ryzen 7 stuff was good, well yeah, but that was just copying. Intel 2, like tell me, tell me something: AMD has done branding wise. That has been an original thought in the last five years.
Give me something five years yeah! No, I I got nothing. I got nothing I was like. I was trying to dig deep and be like, I think, there’s some ideas there, but no! No! You know what okay NH 4×4 tracker says: x3d yeah! I love that it’s so clear AMD had an engineering Advantage, their 3D vcash. They had an engineering advantage and they put that in the product name. They clearly communicated the value ad of 3D vcash, which is that it benefits gaming and certain applications and they put it in the product name. I love it.
That’S how you name a product. You tell us what the it is. Okay, okay hit me with a couple other ones: uh now thread: Ripper is not within the last five years.
Yo. Sorry, sorry, I thought x3d was older too, but I I appeared to be wrong. Yeah no x3d x3d is pretty recent. Okay, uh yep yeah! That’S about it cool um, all right, ridiculous, any who I yeah! I hate it, and apparently oh my God, apparently they’re skipping a number on the next motherboard chipet, going straight from x670 to x870 uh, which is most likely to launch at this year’s computex, which is also going to see the debut of Intel’s z890. It is not good for smaller number that and it’s not good for consumers to see very similar numbers on the Shelf when they are shopping for a product, especially when now even physically.
They don’t appear that different, like the socket in the middle of the motherboard kind of looks the same to the lay person just have a clear numbering and naming scheme of your own. All right! That’S that’s all! I really want to say about that. .